Kimi K3

Moonshot launches Kimi K3 and shows what it is capable of

This article is also available in: Português Español

Moonshot launches Kimi K3 and shows what it is capable of

Moonshot AI, owner of the Kimi franchise, introduced today, July 16, the Kimi K3. One day after launching the K2.7 High Speed, a version focused on higher speed, the company now presented its new frontier model.

The K3 is a 2.8 trillion parameter model, with a 1 million token context, native vision capabilities, and a focus on tasks such as software engineering, knowledge work, and long-term reasoning.

Meet Kimi from Kimi — In the video, the Kimi AI channel introduces Kimi K3 in a short clip strictly focused on atmosphere and design.

Kimi K3

Wait, better than Fable?

The K3 has impressive performance. In benchmarks released by Moonshot itself, it appears between GPT 5.6 Sol and Claude Opus 4.8 in general capability, and in several tests it consistently manages to surpass Opus 4.8.

Kimi K3 benchmarks

Kimi K3 Is Fable Level... (they should be worried) — In the video, the Better Stack channel conducts a technical and practical analysis of the new Kimi K3 AI model, examining official and third-party benchmarks before subjecting it to real programming tests, such as creating an F1 game in 3JS and a full-stack financial dashboard.

The benchmarks are especially strong in coding tasks, agentic workflows, and use in large repositories. The company also highlights cases related to more visual software engineering, such as CAD, game development, and flows with screenshots, video, and multimodal assets.

Kimi K3 agentic workflows

One of the most emphasized points in the official blog is exactly the performance in long engineering sessions, with little human supervision, navigation in massive repositories, and use of terminal tools.

Kimi K3 Ganha do Fable 5 em 90% dos Casos — In this video, Laschuk, creator of the Overclock channel, performs a comparative benchmark between the Kimi K3 and Fable 5 AI models, using more than 6,000 real work sessions to evaluate performance in everyday coding tasks such as debugging, feature creation, CSS, and visual interface development.

Aggressive price

The prices are hyper competitive. For cached input, the price is 30 cents per million tokens; for uncached input, 3 dollars per million; and for output, 15 dollars per million tokens.

Kimi K3 pricing

It is impressive how Moonshot manages to deliver above-expected performance, going head-to-head with some of the best models on the market for a much lower price. On paper, this places Kimi K3 in an extremely aggressive position in the cost-to-capability ratio.

Multimodal and creation

The blog also comments that the model, being multimodal, can do video editing, motion, and animations naturally. In one of the examples, Moonshot itself claims that a Kimi K3 teaser was edited by the model itself.

Edited by Kimi — This video presents an example of audiovisual content edited by Kimi K3 itself, illustrating the model's multimodal capability for video production.

According to the company, this type of task would take something like one to two days of work for an experienced editor, or three to five days for a beginner. The proposal here is to show not only text or code generation, but practical multimedia production capability.

Widgets and Dashboard

In addition, Kimi Work also received new features. Two new features were introduced: Widgets and Dashboard.

Both bring a more visual and natural way to organize components, information, and tasks within the platform. According to Moonshot, Widgets allow generating interactive components directly in the chat, while Dashboard gathers these elements into a persistent and personalized view by project, theme, or objective.

Kimi Work Widgets and Dashboard

Important disclaimers

As a footnote, the Kimi blog itself leaves some very interesting disclaimers.

The first is history sensitivity. K3 was trained to preserve long thought periods, so the agent’s performance may fail when you switch from one model to another. If you go, for example, from a 2.7 model to 3, it may not produce such a high-quality result.

Therefore, they recommend that, to maintain quality, the entire conversation history and all context should already be within the Kimi K3 window.

Another issue mentioned in the blog is that Kimi K3 operates more effectively when it has very specific boundaries, clear instructions, and well-defined frontiers. It can act better when it has a more rigid sequence of steps. If the user gives something ambiguous, or the model encounters small problems, it may make unexpected decisions due to this “excessive proactivity”.

The third observation, which also draws attention, is that the blog itself states that, despite being a hypercompetitive model, Kimi K3 has a notable gap in user experience when compared to Fable 5 and GPT 5.6.

References